How to Know Which Rx 470 You Have

PRODUCT INFO

Visiontek RX 470

Type Graphics Menu

Price $170 - $185

It's no doubt that at this bespeak in time the Radeon RX 470 holds the 1080p bang for buck crown.  We've looked at the Sapphire RX 470 Nitro in the by and establish it to be a bully performer.  Only today we're taking a look at the VisionTek RX 470 OC and see how it holds up when compared to some tough competition.  Interestingly enough VisionTek went for a reference designed card through and through.  When it beginning arrived I was hopeful for another unlockable carte du jour as the identifier on the PCB matched that of our XFX RX 480, but after swell it open up we found a few missing power phases indicative that this was a true RX 470, foiled I suppose.

What VisionTek Did Different

Simply that'south not all in itself a negative and shouldn't be taken as such.  VisionTek did do ane thing correct in regards to the reference cooler, the cadre heatsink.  Dissimilar what others take washed with the RX 470 when using the reference style libation VisionTek stuck with the RX 480 design, significant rather than a solid aluminum chunk they've used the cooler with the copper slug.  Since nosotros're in true reference design fashion the I/O remains untouched sporting 3x DP one.iv and HDMI 2.0 ports. Since this is an OC model VisionTek has pushed the core by the reference 1206MHz upward to 1226MHz and the retentiveness from 1650 base to 1750 base.  Thanks to the memory bump it'southward at present matching its bigger brother, the RX 480 4GB, in terms of memory speed and bandwidth.  The simply event hither is that they've washed this all on a reference board which, much like the RX 480 nosotros reviewed, results in quite the core clock fluctuation.  This instability in the clock left our card running around the 950MHz mark for nearly of our gaming benchmarks.

Overclocking

Okay, so the fluctuating cadre clock is a bit of a plow off, I get it.  Simply, let's take a look at the overclocking functioning nosotros were able to get out of this card.  I wasn't expecting almost the button as what we saw on the Sapphire RX 470 Nitro since we are only working with a single six pin and a reference power delivery system, but the results were pretty good.  It took a while to blast downwards our summit overclock that would make it though all tests and agree that clock. No fluctuations were acceptable for an bodily overclock on our Polaris cards.

Overclocking led united states of america down an interesting road here, we'll beginning with the core.  The cadre wasn't that hard to go up at making sure we went +50 on the power limit, but we apace ran into a power commitment limit when we crossed 1100mV and found we had negative scaling.  So, we backed downwardly the voltage to 1100mV and left it there while easing up on the core where we found 1300MHz to exist rock solid.  At present, coming from an average out of the box country of 950MHz I'd say that'south a healthy jump.

The retentivity was elementary enough, it went straight to 2000MHz from its manufacturing plant clock of 1750MHz without a hitch, anything past that was simply a no go.  The fan curve is the most interesting thing here.  Out of the box the fan bend seemed to be taken over by Ruby rather than what the card was designed to do, resulting in a peak stock temp of 80c while the fan never went past 22% or 1600rpm.  Sure it was expressionless silent, only those temps had to have something to do with the core clock since the GPU target temp was 76c.  Okay, that out of the fashion, taking over control of the fan allowed for information technology to become upwards to 40% or 2300rpm (nevertheless extremely quiet) just reduce the temps, while overclocked, down to 76c at its absolute hottest.

Testing The RX 470

We tested on our X99 Broadwell-E based test sytem. For DX11 and OpenGL we utilized FRAPS for capturing performance during our runs. For our DX12 testing I wanted to take a moment and thank the guys at CustomPCReview again for helping develop a tool that will at present allow us to deliver the aforementioned level of results for DX12 and Vulkan equally nosotros take with DX11. DX12 tests were conducted with OCAT and once the runs are all completed three times the averages for average FPS, 1% depression, and .1% low are taken and plotted. We employ i% and .1% lows rather than absolute minimum as the absolute minimum typically represents an outlier frame and doesn't typically represent actual gameplay.

X99 Examination Organization

CPU	Intel Core i7 6800k (four.1GHz)
Memory	32GB CORSAIR Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666MHz
Motherboard	ASUS X99A-II
Storage	Crucial MX100 512GB SSD Seagate 2TB SSHD
PSU	Corsair AX860i

*All testing was completed when these were current drivers*

Radeon 16.11.5

GeForce 375.95

Battlefield i

Battlefield one was tested simply like in our game functioning review using the "Over The Hill" mission at 1080p using the Ultra preset in both DX11 and DX12.

DOOM

DOOM was run at 1080p using the Ultra preset with TSSAA x8 enabled in both OpenGL and Vulkan.

Clay Rally

DiRT Rally was run at 1080p using the Ultra preset with 2x MSAA and results were taken from the in game benchmark tool.

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

Deus Ex: Flesh Divided was run at 1080p using the High preset along with TAA enabled and results were taken from the in game criterion tool.

Forza Motorsports 6: APEX

Forza Motorsports 6 was run at 1080p using the highest quality settings but 2x MSAA.  Track used was Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps and run while in the rain to represent a more enervating load from the game.

Grand Theft Car Five

GTA V was run at 1080p using the Very High settings forth with 2x MSAA.  Results were taken from the final segment of the in game benchmark likewise.

HITMAN (2016)

HITMAN (2016) was run at 1080p using the Ultra preset forth with SMAA in both DX11 and DX12.  Results were from the included benchmark utility.

Rising of the Tomb Raider

RotTR was run at 1080p using the High preset but this become around no anti aliasing was applied.  Results were pulled from our custom run through the Geothermal Valley.

The Witcher 3

The Witcher iii was run at 1080p using the Loftier preset and H/Due west disabled.  Our custom benchmark includes a horse ride along the hillside, through the forest, and a jog through Crow's Perch.

Temps and Power Draw

Temperatures were taken after a one-half 60 minutes run of Unigine Valley at Extreme Hd settings.

Ability draw was taken after several runs of the Firestrike Stress examination and the peak power describe was recorded using a Kill-A-Watt.

AMD Polaris GCN 4.0 GPU Lineup:

Graphics Carte du jour Name	AMD Radeon RX 480	AMD Radeon RX 470	AMD Radeon RX 470D	AMD Radeon RX 460 1024 SPs	AMD Radeon RX 460
Graphics Core	Polaris x	Polaris 10	Polaris ten	Polaris 11	Polaris 11
Process Node	14nm FinFET	14nm FinFET	14nm FinFET	14nm FinFET	14nm FinFET
Dice Size	232mm2	232mm2	232mm2	123mm2	123mm2
Transistors	5.seven Billion	5.seven Billion	five.7 Billion	3.0 Billion	three.0 Billion
Stream Processors	2304 SPs	2048 SPs	1792 SPs	1024 SPs	896 SPs
Clock Frequency	1266 MHz	1206 MHz	1206 MHz	1200 MHz	1200 MHz
Compute Performance	5.8 TFLOPs	4.9 TFLOPs	4.three TFLOPs	ii.56 TFLOPs	2.2 TFLOPs
VRAM	4/eight GB GDDR5	4 GB GDDR5	iv GB GDDR5	four GB GDDR5	2/four GB GDDR5
Bus Interface	256-chip	256-bit	256-bit	128-bit	128-bit
Memory Speed	eight GHz	6.6 GHz	6.six GHz	seven GHz	7 GHz
Retentiveness Bandwidth	256 GB/due south	211 GB/due south	211 GB/s	112 GB/s	112 GB/s
TDP	150W	120W	110W	75W	75W
Launch Date	29th June	4th Baronial	20th Oct	TBD	eighth Baronial
Launch Price	$199 US (iv GB) $239 United states (8 GB)	$179 U.s. (four GB)	$149 US (4 GB)	TBD	$99 US (2 GB) $119 US (4 GB)
New Price	$199 US (four GB) $239 US (eight GB)	$169 US (4 GB)	$149 U.s.a. (4 GB)	TBD	$99 Usa (four GB) $89 US (2 GB)

Decision

And so out of the box the VisionTek RX 470 isn't going to blow your socks off, just information technology'southward bang-up performance for the money and practically sips power and is ridiculously tranquillity.  I know the quietness factor is subjective since I don't have a style to properly test that at the moment, but it's as quiet under load as the RX 480 is at idle and that'southward saying something. Merely push it a little, or a lot, and it rapidly matches the performance of its bigger brother for a lot less money, oestrus, and racket while notwithstanding staying under it in power draw.  While almost every other card maker has a wild and out cooling solution I'g glad to encounter that someone stuck with a bonafide reference RX 470 for those who could benefit from it.

For those who would rather watch than read, take a wait at the video review above. Features some under the shroud shots too for those interested.

seven.5

The VisionTek RX 470 OC suffers a flake out of the box, but rapidly changes into something great when pushed even a little. The VisionTek RX 470 OC makes the argument near impossible for less expensive graphics cards to be considered.

Performance7

Value9

Blueprint & Aesthetics7

Features7

Pros

• Good power draw. Tranquility under load. Performs in a higher place its course with overclock. Unmatched at it'due south cost bespeak.

Cons

• Lower than necessary fan speed resulting in higher than desired temperatures. Limited overclocking due to reference design. Lower than desired average Core Clock speed.

mcavoygonchediess.blogspot.com

Source: https://wccftech.com/review/visiontek-rx-470-punching-class/

Share this post